tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-72322191439003763342024-03-05T12:41:31.502-08:00Ed Magedson Exposed: Criminal Extortionist and Scammer Behind RipoffReport.comInformation, Updates and Reports exposing Ed Magedson, the Criminal Extortionist and Scammer behind RipoffReport.com, and what you can do to help take action against him.WWu777http://www.blogger.com/profile/04368933194799864846noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-43054848662958112372015-02-09T11:37:00.001-08:002016-06-28T10:27:24.821-07:00Request Removal of Ripoffreport from Google (Form)Simply enter the search phrases that display unfavorable results in Google Search:
<br />
<form action="https://page1.me/quote.php">
<input name="q" placeholder="For example, John Doe" type="text" value="" />
<select name="d"><option value="www.google.com">USA/Global (www.google.com)</option><option value="www.google.com.ar">Argentina (www.google.com.ar)</option><option value="www.google.com.au">Australia (www.google.com.au)</option><option value="www.google.at">Austria (www.google.at)</option><option value="www.google.be">Belgium (www.google.be)</option><option value="www.google.com.br">Brasil (www.google.com.br)</option><option value="www.google.vg">British Virgin Islands (www.google.vg)</option><option value="www.google.bg">Bulgaria (www.google.bg)</option><option value="www.google.ca">Canada (www.google.ca)</option><option value="www.google.cl">Chile (www.google.cl)</option><option value="www.google.com.co">Colombia (www.google.com.co)</option><option value="www.google.hr">Croatia (www.google.hr)</option><option value="www.google.com.cy">Cyprus (www.google.com.cy)</option><option value="www.google.cz">Czech (www.google.cz)</option><option value="www.google.dk">Denmark (www.google.dk)</option><option value="www.google.fi">Finland (www.google.fi)</option><option value="www.google.fr">France (www.google.fr)</option><option value="www.google.de">Germany (www.google.de)</option><option value="www.google.gr">Greece (www.google.gr)</option><option value="www.google.com.hk">Hong Kong (www.google.com.hk)</option><option value="www.google.hu">Hungary (www.google.hu)</option><option value="www.google.co.in">India (www.google.co.in)</option><option value="www.google.co.id">Indonesia (www.google.co.id)</option><option value="www.google.co.il">Israel (www.google.co.il)</option><option value="www.google.it">Italia (www.google.it)</option><option value="www.google.co.jp">Japan (www.google.co.jp)</option><option value="www.google.lt">Lithuania (www.google.lt)</option><option value="www.google.com.my">Malaysia (www.google.com.my)</option><option value="www.google.com.mx">Mexico (www.google.com.mx)</option><option value="www.google.nl">Netherlands (www.google.nl)</option><option value="www.google.co.nz">New Zealand (www.google.co.nz)</option><option value="www.google.no">Norway (www.google.no)</option><option value="www.google.com.pa">Panama (www.google.com.pa)</option><option value="www.google.com.ph">Philippines (www.google.com.ph)</option><option value="www.google.pl">Poland (www.google.pl)</option><option value="www.google.pt">Portugal (www.google.pt)</option><option value="www.google.com.pr">Puerto Rico (www.google.com.pr)</option><option value="www.google.ro">Romania (www.google.ro)</option><option value="www.google.ru">Russia (www.google.ru)</option><option value="www.google.com.sa">Saudi Arabia (www.google.com.sa)</option><option value="www.google.com.sg">Singapore (www.google.com.sg)</option><option value="www.google.sk">Slovak (www.google.sk)</option><option value="www.google.si">Slovenia (www.google.si)</option><option value="www.google.co.za">South Africa (www.google.co.za)</option><option value="www.google.co.kr">South Korea (www.google.co.kr)</option><option value="www.google.es">Spain (www.google.es)</option><option value="www.google.se">Sweden (www.google.se)</option><option value="www.google.ch">Switzerland (www.google.ch)</option><option value="www.google.com.tw">Taiwan (www.google.com.tw)</option><option value="www.google.co.th">Thailand (www.google.co.th)</option><option value="www.google.com.tr">Turkey (www.google.com.tr)</option><option value="www.google.ae">UAE (www.google.ae)</option><option value="www.google.co.uk">United Kingdom (www.google.co.uk)</option></select><input name="k" type="hidden" value="2d7a721b" />
<input name="ref" type="hidden" value="ripoffreport-victims-unite.org" />
<input name="quote_btn" type="submit" value="Next Step" /></form>
Results begin to take effect within 2-3 weeks.
<br />
<br />
<b>DISCLOSURE:</b> This is a commercial service designed for business customers to help reduce lost sales due to online defamation. I'm not BadForPeople, but I catch those who are.http://www.blogger.com/profile/11799442554198829832noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-22005685834196471002014-09-04T07:15:00.001-07:002016-06-28T10:25:07.899-07:00Remove Defamatory Results From Google - New Solution fort Ripoff Report ProblemsThe following is a service that guarantees to remove Ripoffreport.com from Google Search Results.<br />
<br />
Get a free quote here:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.page1.me/">WWW.PAGE1.ME</a></span><br />
<br />
The following graphs are actual client results for August 2014:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://page1.me/" target="_blank"><img alt="http://page1.me" border="0" height="640" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Nu_bijtpoeY/VAhzkmgbBoI/AAAAAAAAA6g/J7E33uzcJ-o/s1600/20140829-Page1.me-Actual-Client-Case-Results.png" width="627" /></a></div>
<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-82005418489581972152014-03-28T22:15:00.000-07:002014-03-28T22:16:53.204-07:00Google Blocks RipOffReport.com for having "Unacceptable Business Practices"<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
</div>
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/V8j5TrVsCas" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
Join the new group: <a data-mce-href="http://www.ripoffreport-victims-unite.org/" href="http://www.ripoffreport-victims-unite.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="http://www.ripoffreport-victims-unite.org/">http://www.ripoffreport-victims-unite.org</a></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br />
Read More below</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<a data-mce-href="http://rexxfield.com" href="http://rexxfield.com/" title="Rexxfield Internet Defamation Law Suit">Rexxfield Internet Law Research</a> has published a short 3 minute video demonstrating how the Google AdWords® business unit has banned advertising for RipOffReport.com due to "Unacceptable Business Practices". The findings give rise to other questions however:</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
(1) Why does Google Search business unit hold RipOffReport.com in such high regard by giving it such high search rankings and;</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
(2) Why is Google AdChoices® business unit sharing revenue with RipOffReport by distributing advertisements through their appalling website?</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">
<br /></div>
WWu777http://www.blogger.com/profile/04368933194799864846noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-1815358539356494602013-02-16T08:44:00.000-08:002014-03-29T06:36:25.456-07:00How You Can Help Fight Ripoff Report: Groups and Petitions<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><b>Video: EXPOSED: RipOffReport.com & Why It Appears Page 1 of Google </b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><br /></span>
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tMTCCT_NtBk" width="560"></iframe>
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><br /></span>
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;">If you would like to help join the fight against Ripoff Report, here's what you can do. Visit these groups and petitions against Ripoff Report and its abusive unethical practices of extortion, and make your voice heard. Together we can make a difference.</span><br />
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #303f6b; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14.390625px;"><u><a href="http://www.rexxfield.com/RipOffReport-com-Victims-Support-Group.php">http://www.rexxfield.com/RipOffReport-com-Victims-Support-Group.php</a></u></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #303f6b; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14.390625px;"><u><a href="http://www.facebook.com/RipOffReportRevolt">http://www.facebook.com/RipOffReportRevolt</a></u></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #303f6b; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14.390625px;"><u><a href="http://www.facebook.com/badforpeople">http://www.facebook.com/badforpeople</a></u></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #303f6b; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14.390625px;"><u><a href="http://twitter.com/Rexxfield">http://twitter.com/Rexxfield</a></u></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="line-height: 14.390625px;"><br /></span>
<br />
<br />
<br />WWu777http://www.blogger.com/profile/04368933194799864846noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-51487603375684418252011-11-02T22:08:00.000-07:002014-03-28T20:45:32.180-07:00Can I REMOVE BadBoyReport Defamation from Search Results? The answer is yes, sometimes. But there may be a hard road ahead of you.<br />
<br />
There been a few suggestions as to different ways you can mitigate the damage being done to you by the bad boy report website at the following location:<br />
<br />
<br />
See more at:<br />
<a href="http://authorizedstatement.org/BadBoyReport.kr/who-is-Cadillacer/how-to-remove-Bad-Boy-Report.php">http://authorizedstatement.org/BadBoyReport.kr/who-is-Cadillacer/how-to-remove-Bad-Boy-Report.php</a>I'm not BadForPeople, but I catch those who are.http://www.blogger.com/profile/11799442554198829832noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-84441594416319289742011-05-03T02:02:00.000-07:002014-03-29T06:36:12.997-07:00Ed Magedson is a Criminal Extortionist and Scammer! Total Proof!<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzDKv5nwORld-cTAqdDu8KINOFABAB5RyQruuuMFBU3FpA0fZM90Ik2nWbVkDJarhnK7jNXWa5t8rBdNmHm9DpqR6T7TZnlzY6IZYqwokv6WBdwn3Z9CGfTew5zc7rM3YXiYoboNHVTbKA/s1600/edmagedson.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzDKv5nwORld-cTAqdDu8KINOFABAB5RyQruuuMFBU3FpA0fZM90Ik2nWbVkDJarhnK7jNXWa5t8rBdNmHm9DpqR6T7TZnlzY6IZYqwokv6WBdwn3Z9CGfTew5zc7rM3YXiYoboNHVTbKA/s320/edmagedson.jpg" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5602414417830786642" style="cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 190px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 300px;" /></a><b>Ed Magedson, the criminal extortionist behind RipoffReport.com</b></div>
<br />
This is a warning for anyone out there who is considering becoming involved with Ed Magedson of RipoffReport.com or posting on it. <span style="font-weight: bold;">He is a SCAMMER and EXTORTIONIST and I have total proof below. </span> (Note: I will NOT remove this site exposing him until he removes MY posts from his site as I asked him to)<br />
<br />
Basically, he set up RipoffReport.com to EXTORT money from people unethically. When someone posts a complaint, it can never be removed, even if the poster requests or demands it. Instead, they are referred to an arbitration program that costs thousands of dollars! That is pure extortion. There is no logical reason to ask a poster to pay thousands of dollars just to remove his own post on a website. Legitimate sites allow the poster to remove their own posts, or will gladly remove it per their request.<br />
<br />
Anyone can put up a site and demand extortion. But it's highly unethical and an obvious scam. And it's a loser way to make money as well. Such people have no ethics, conscience, morals and are sociopaths and criminals. That's exactly what Ed Magedson is.<br />
<br />
I emailed RipoffReport asking them to remove my reports at:<br />
<br />
<a class="external text" href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/misc-health-specialists/diagnose-me-com-by-s/diagnose-me-com-by-stefan-muth-325de.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ripoffreport.com/misc-health-specialists/diagnose-me-com-by-s/diagnose-me-com-by-stefan-muth-325de.htm</a><br />
<a class="external text" href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/on-line-business/diagnose-me-com-by-s/diagnose-me-com-by-stefan-muth-nc4b4.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ripoffreport.com/on-line-business/diagnose-me-com-by-s/diagnose-me-com-by-stefan-muth-nc4b4.htm</a><br />
<br />
They did not respond. Instead, they expect you to pay thousands for their arbitration program. Here is how it works, according to their site. Note the part in bold.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/remove-a-report/vip-arbitration-program/ed-magedson-explains-7ad2e.htm">http://www.ripoffreport.com/remove-a-report/vip-arbitration-program/ed-magedson-explains-7ad2e.htm</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;">"Here's how it works.</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">We have contracted with private arbitrators who have extensive experience, including experienced judges in court. Once the program builds momentum, we will add other highly qualified arbitrators to our panel. You submit a written arbitration statement identifying the false statements in the report, or explaining that the report was posted by a competitor pretending to be a customer. You are also given the opportunity to support your position with documented evidence and/or sworn affidavits. <span style="font-weight: bold;">There is a filing fee of $2,000 to pay for the arbitrator's time and for administration of the program.</span> The author of the report is then given the opportunity to respond and you are given the opportunity to reply.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>"<br />
<br />
$2,000 just to remove a post that takes seconds to delete?! What a RIPOFF! (pardon the pun) This guy Ed Magedson is dreaming. What low class scum.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, take a look at his totally illogical explanation and excuse about why he won't remove any reports on his site at the author's request.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/ConsumersSayThankYou/WantToSueRipoffReport.aspx">http://www.ripoffreport.com/ConsumersSayThankYou/WantToSueRipoffReport.aspx</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;">"If I get the original author of a report to send a retraction demand, will Ripoff Report remove the complaint?</span> <span style="font-style: italic;"><br />
<br />
We are ALWAYS happy to hear that a dispute has been resolved! If you reach an agreement to resolve a complaint and the original author is willing to retract his/her report, they can easily post the retraction as an update to their report. This is 100% free and it will let the world know that the matter has been handled to the customer's satisfaction. We are always happy to hear about parties resolving their disputes amicably and we strongly encourage authors to post updates any time their complaints have been satisfied.</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">However, we cannot and will not consider removal requests from anyone, including a request which claims to be from the original author of a report. The reasons for this are explained above, but to summarize them again, we cannot determine which side to a dispute is telling the truth. Although our Terms of Service prohibit users from posting false information, we simply cannot serve as the judge or jury in disputes between two parties. Likewise, if we receive an email from someone claiming to be the author of a report and asking that it be removed, we have no way of knowing if this request is really from the original author, nor do we know if the request is seeking the removal of truthful information solely because of a threat from the person listed in the report.</span><span style="font-style: italic;">"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">This makes NO LOGICAL SENSE at all.</span> You can easily verify the author of a report simply by either 1) letting them delete their own posts by LOGGING IN to their account first (like legitimate websites do), or 2) verifying that the email address from the author matches the email on the account of the author. It's that simple! Every other legitimate site works that way. Are we to believe that Ed Magedson has no common sense or understanding of how forums and websites work?! Yeah right.<br />
<br />
Even on internet forums, a poster can delete his own post by simply doing it from their account. No one has to email the forum admin or moderator from an anonymous email asking their post to be removed. Magedson's explanation is stupid and an insult to the intelligence of the reader.<br />
<br />
Moreover, Magedson states on his site that he believes in the First Amendment and that anyone should be allowed to say anything about another person or company, so long as the accused is allowed to respond by posting a rebuttal. Well if that's so, then why doesn't he apply that standard to himself, and allow users to post negative reports about him and his site on RipoffReport.com, so long as he is allowed to respond to them too? Why does he not allow that? If one truly believes in something, then one will apply it to himself or herself as well. So the fact that Magedson doesn't, is self-evident proof that he is a HYPOCRITE.<br />
<br />
Finally, for some damning and incriminating info about Ed Magedson, see this website about his criminal activities, arrests (with scanned documents and police reports) and $20,000 reward offered for his whereabouts so that he can be served in court.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ezripofflawsuit.com/">http://www.ezripofflawsuit.com</a><br />
<br />
The obvious truth is that Ed Magedson is a criminal extortion scammer and a low scum, not that he can't verify who the author of a report is.<br />
<br />
So now that I've exposed Magedson and his scam operation, I formally declare that I will NOT remove this site exposing him until he removes MY own reports per my request from his site at the links above.<br />
<br />
So if you are seeing this page, then it means that he has not removed them yet.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">To Ed Magedson:</span> When you remove my reports, post a notification in the comments section below, and I will check it and if it has been removed, then I will remove this site as well. I hope you will cooperate and find a more ethical way to earn money.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #cc0000;">Warning to Ed Magedson:</span> If you do not remove my report as I requested, I will post a copy of this report about you on ScamChecker.com. Once there, it CANNOT be removed, EVER, even at my request! Furthermore, I will also create blogs about you on Blogger and Wordpress, containing this report, which will rank very high in the search engines! So do the right thing and remove my report on your site, and we will be all clear.</span><br />
<br />
Thanks. I await your compliance and cooperation.<br />
<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Winston<br />
<br />
Links:<br />
<a href="http://ed-magedson.blogspot.com/">http://ed-magedson.blogspot.com</a><br />
<a href="http://ripoffreport-scam.blogspot.com/">http://ripoffreport-scam.blogspot.com</a><br />
<a href="http://edmagedsonscam.wordpress.com/">http://edmagedsonscam.wordpress.com</a><br />
<a href="http://ripoffreportscam.wordpress.com/">http://ripoffreportscam.wordpress.com</a>WWu777http://www.blogger.com/profile/04368933194799864846noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7232219143900376334.post-61070653301269683782010-09-02T08:10:00.000-07:002013-09-02T08:11:51.343-07:00CAUGHT: Reporter DANIEL GLICK Exposed by Licensed Private Detective<br />
<div class="title bottomLine">
BUSTED! JOURNALIST DANIEL GLICK EXPOSED BY
PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR. "Because the truth isn't always profitable" - The
Story Group Ethics Alert Author</div>
<h3 class="MsoNormal2">
By Michael Roberts of Rexxfield</h3>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2013/05/04/10702284/gI_125604_Michael-Roberts-with-Daniel-Glick-Journalistic-Ethics-ALERT-Guide.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2013/05/04/10702284/gI_125604_Michael-Roberts-with-Daniel-Glick-Journalistic-Ethics-ALERT-Guide.png" /></a></div>
PRIVATER INVESTIGATOR MICHAEL ROBERTS’ RESPONDS TO INACCURATE ARTICLE, “I
MARRIED A MURDERESS,” PUBLISHED ON APRIL 20, 2013 IN THE SYDNEY MORNING
HERALD<br />
<br />
<h3 align="right">
<em>"Although it is somewhat torturous to read, Michael's logical analysis of Glick's article is a masterpiece.</em><strong>"</strong></h3>
<h3 align="right">
<strong>~JBS</strong></h3>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
How this response works:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
Text displayed in BLACK or <span style="color: red;">RED</span> is the original story as published (after the article title below). The BLACK
text is content that does not require a response; <span style="color: red;">RED</span> text represents Glick’s lies, spin or innuendo for which a response is
demanded. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<i>NOTE:
To avoid confusion, the article excerpts are all italicized and indented just
like this, <span style="color: red;">with challenged excerpts in red.</span>
<o:p></o:p>
</i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
Text displayed in <span style="color: blue;">BLUE express my response
to each published lie</span>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
This is just the first example of a lie by Reporter Daniel Glick. The comprehensive explanation is available here: <a href="http://www.authorizedstatement.org/people/michael-roberts/statements/journalistic-ethics-logical-fallacies-project-daniel-glick.php" target="_blank">Reporter Daniel Glick Embarrassed by logical colonoscopy of his inaccurate attack piece by private investigator.</a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
<br /></div>
<h2>
<span style="color: windowtext;">Response to: “I MARRIED A MURDERESS” by
Daniel Glick
<o:p></o:p>
</span></h2>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
Published Date April 20, 2013 Sydney Morning Herald<br />
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<b><i><span style="color: red;">On the
surface, it's a straightforward enough scenario: an Aussie dad locked in an
international custody battle with his homicidal American ex-wife. But as Daniel
Glick discovers, the truth is a whole lot murkier.
<o:p></o:p>
</span></i></b><br />
<b><i><span style="color: red;"><br /></span></i></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2">
<span style="color: blue;">A combination of logical fallacies were
used by journalist Daniel Glick in the above article summary as described
below:
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst2" style="mso-list: l11 level1 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">(1)<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">APOPHASIS AND ARGUMENT BY INNUENDO
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l11 level2 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<b><u><span style="color: blue;">APOPHASIS AND ARGUMENT BY INNUENDO</span></u></b><span style="color: blue;"> involves implicitly suggesting a conclusion without stating
it outright. In this example the overly specific nature of the innuendo. The
structure of the fallacious argument looks like this:
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S ARGUMENT:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph2" style="margin-left: 1.25in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l29 level1 lfo28; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Michael Roberts is
somehow suspect, even though Daniel Glick does not make (or justify) a direct
statement of accusation.
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S PROBLEM:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst2" style="margin-left: 1.25in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo47; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">The innuendo has no
supporting evidence except for other logical fallacies such as an appeal to
authority, and guilt by association.
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="margin-left: 1.25in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo47; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">b.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Whereas, I implicitly
told Daniel Glick during the interview that "the truth behind the story is
incredibly convoluted". Daniel Glick's use of the word "discovers”
implies that he is responsible for his revelations. Whereas, he did not
discover the truth, he simply verified my contention that the case is
convoluted (i.e. "Murkier").
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="margin-left: 1.25in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo47; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">c.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">MOTIVE: Daniel Glick
needs the reader and his editor to believe that he discovered something new to
validate his status as an "Investigative Journalist" and to justify
the fee paid to him for the story.
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="mso-list: l11 level1 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">(2)<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">APPEAL TO AUTHORITY
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l11 level2 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">AN APPEAL TO AUTHORITY,
also known as an argument from authority (Latin: argumentum ad verecundiam), it
is argued that something is true; because someone of authority (like an
investigative journalist) says it is true.
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S ARGUMENT:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l66 level1 lfo29; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Daniel Glick says X is
true
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l66 level1 lfo29; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">b.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Daniel Glick is an
authoritative source
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l66 level1 lfo29; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">c.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">So X must be true
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S PROBLEM:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l68 level1 lfo30; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Daniel Glick and his
<a href="http://badforpeople.org/ethics-alert-journalist-editor-ben-naparstek-of-fairfax-media-busted/" target="_blank"><u>Editor Ben Naparstek</u></a> have, according to evidence published by peers,
demonstrated a propensity to publish lies and what peers describe as “hatchet
pieces” and/or “inaccurate attack pieces”<br />
<br />
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="mso-list: l11 level1 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">(3)<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">ASSOCIATION FALLACY
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l11 level2 lfo4; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">AN ASSOCIATION FALLACY
is an inductive informal fallacy of the type <i>hasty generalization</i> or <i>red
herring</i>, which asserts that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities
of another, merely by an irrelevant association. It is sometimes referred to as <i>guilt by association</i>. Association
fallacies are a special case of <i>red
herring</i>, and can be based on an <i>appeal
to emotion</i>.
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S ARGUMENT:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l40 level1 lfo31; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Michael is associated
with the Richter Murder case
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l40 level1 lfo31; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">b.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Michael is also
associated with the Zuckerman case, which is “murky”
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l40 level1 lfo31; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">c.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">Therefore, Michael’s character
must be murky.
<o:p></o:p>
</span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal2" style="margin-left: .5in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">DANIEL GLICK’S PROBLEM:
<o:p></o:p>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph2" style="margin-left: 1.0in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l20 level2 lfo27; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="color: blue; mso-bidi-font-family: Cambria; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria;">a.<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 7pt;"> </span></span>
<span style="color: blue;">What is true of one
thing is not necessarily true of the other. </span></div>
</div>
I'm not BadForPeople, but I catch those who are.http://www.blogger.com/profile/11799442554198829832noreply@blogger.com1